Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
Rutin

Rutin

Research reviewed: Up until 03/2026

Rutin is a dietary supplement with 9 published peer-reviewed studies involving 346 participants, researched for Cardiovascular & Venous Health, Anti-inflammatory & Antioxidant, Metabolic Health and 1 more areas.

9
Studies
346
Participants
1993–2025
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Strong Evidence

Cardiovascular & Venous Health

Strong
3 studies 3 of 3 positive 155 participants

Anti-inflammatory & Antioxidant

Strong
2 studies 2 of 2 positive 96 participants

Metabolic Health

Strong
3 studies 2 of 3 positive 95 participants 2 human

Metabolic Health & Inflammation

Moderate
1 study 1 of 1 positive 0 participants

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

8/9
Randomised
4/9
Double-Blind
5/9
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (1993)
60
Study 2 (2016)
55
Study 3 (2004)
40
Study 4 (2018)
46
Study 5 (2020)
50
Study 6 (2015)
50
Study 7 (2019)
45
Study 8 (2022)
0

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
1993
1
2004
1
2015
1
2016
1
2018
1
2019
1
2020
1
2022
1
2025

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Cardiovascular & Venous Health

1

To evaluate rutin on venous insufficiency and leg edema

1993 60 participants 12 weeks 500 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To evaluate rutin on venous insufficiency and leg edema

Dose

500 mg/day rutin

Participants

60 patients with chronic venous insufficiency

Duration

12 weeks

Results

Significant reduction in leg edema (p=0.01) and pain. CEAP venous disease classification improved. Capillary fragility and permeability reduced. Symptomatic venous insufficiency improved.

How They Measured It

Edema circumference, CEAP classification, pain VAS

Read full study
2

To assess rutin on blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers

2016 55 participants 8 weeks 500 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To assess rutin on blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers

Dose

500 mg/day rutin

Participants

55 adults with prehypertension

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Significant reduction in SBP (-6 mmHg, p=0.02) and oxidised LDL (-15%). CRP reduced. HDL increased by 8%. Cardioprotective effects demonstrated.

How They Measured It

SBP, DBP, LDL, HDL, oxLDL, CRP

Read full study
3

To evaluate rutin on anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic effects

2004 40 participants 4 weeks 250 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised, controlled trial

Purpose

To evaluate rutin on anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic effects

Dose

250 mg/day rutin

Participants

40 adults at cardiovascular risk

Duration

4 weeks

Results

Significant reduction in platelet aggregation (p=0.02) and thromboxane B2. Fibrinogen levels reduced. Anti-thrombotic properties confirmed. Cardiovascular risk reduction demonstrated.

How They Measured It

Platelet aggregation, thromboxane B2, fibrinogen

Read full study

Anti-inflammatory & Antioxidant

4

To evaluate rutin supplementation on antioxidant status and inflammation

2018 46 participants 8 weeks 500 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To evaluate rutin supplementation on antioxidant status and inflammation

Dose

500 mg/day rutin

Participants

46 healthy adults

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Significant increases in SOD (+18%) and GSH antioxidant enzyme activities. CRP reduced by 16%. TEAC antioxidant capacity increased. Well-tolerated.

How They Measured It

TEAC, SOD, GSH, CRP, IL-6

Read full study
5

To assess rutin on inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes

2020 50 participants 12 weeks 500 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To assess rutin on inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes

Dose

500 mg/day rutin

Participants

50 type 2 diabetes patients

Duration

12 weeks

Results

Significant reduction in CRP (22%), IL-6 (19%), and TNF-alpha (14%) vs placebo. HbA1c trended lower. Oxidative stress markers reduced.

How They Measured It

CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, HbA1c

Read full study

Metabolic Health

6

To evaluate rutin on lipid profile and insulin resistance

2015 50 participants 12 weeks 500 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Purpose

To evaluate rutin on lipid profile and insulin resistance

Dose

500 mg/day rutin

Participants

50 overweight adults with dyslipidaemia

Duration

12 weeks

Results

Significant reductions in triglycerides (13%), LDL (9%), and HOMA-IR (-14%). HDL increased by 7%. Insulin sensitivity improved.

How They Measured It

LDL, HDL, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, fasting insulin

Read full study
7

To assess rutin effects on bone health and osteoporosis prevention

2019 45 participants 6 months 100 mg/day rutin
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomised, controlled trial

Purpose

To assess rutin effects on bone health and osteoporosis prevention

Dose

100 mg/day rutin

Participants

45 postmenopausal women

Duration

6 months

Results

Significant reduction in bone resorption marker CTX (p=0.03). BMD trended toward maintenance vs loss in placebo. Calcium absorption markers improved.

How They Measured It

BMD, bone turnover markers (OC, CTX), calcium metabolism

Read full study
8

To summarize clinical evidence for rutin supplementation benefits

2022 ? participants Various Various
Review/Other Mixed

Study Type

Systematic review

Purpose

To summarize clinical evidence for rutin supplementation benefits

Dose

Various

Participants

Systematic review

Duration

Various

Results

Evidence supports cardiovascular, anti-inflammatory, and metabolic benefits. Venous insufficiency benefit well-established. Antioxidant and anti-platelet effects consistent. Bone health preliminary. Generally well-tolerated.

How They Measured It

Systematic review of human trials

Read full study

Metabolic Health & Inflammation

9

To evaluate the effects of a PEA-rutin and hydroxytyrosol food supplement in patients with metabolic syndrome.

2025 ? participants 3 months PEA co-micronized with rutin 700 mg/day plus hydroxytyrosol
Human Study RCT Positive

Study Type

Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of a PEA-rutin and hydroxytyrosol food supplement in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Dose

PEA co-micronized with rutin 700 mg/day plus hydroxytyrosol

Participants

Metabolic syndrome patients

Duration

3 months

Results

The PEA-rutin and hydroxytyrosol supplement significantly improved metabolic syndrome components including lipid profile, blood pressure, and waist circumference.

How They Measured It

Metabolic syndrome components (waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile, glucose)

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Rutin research

What does the research say about Rutin?

There are currently 9 peer-reviewed studies on Rutin (Rutin), involving 346 total participants. Research covers Cardiovascular health, Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant status and 2 more areas. The overall evidence strength is rated as Strong.

How strong is the evidence for Rutin?

The evidence is currently rated as "Strong Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (8 human studies), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Rutin been studied for?

Rutin has been researched for: Cardiovascular health, Anti-inflammatory, Antioxidant status, Blood pressure, Venous health. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Rutin based on human trials?

Yes, 8 out of 9 studies are human trials. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.