Home Supplements How We Rate Blog
Urtica dioica L. (Root / Radix Extract)

Stinging Nettle Root

Research reviewed: Up until 03/2026

Stinging Nettle Root (Urtica dioica L. (Root / Radix Extract)) is a dietary supplement with 5 published peer-reviewed studies involving 860 participants, researched for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Anti-inflammatory Activity, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

5
Studies
860
Participants
1997–2022
Research Span

Evidence at a Glance

Strength is scored by study design, sample size, study type, and outcomes

Overall: Strong Evidence

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Strong
3 studies 2 of 3 positive 720 participants

Anti-inflammatory Activity

Weak
1 study 0 of 1 positive 0 participants 0 human

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Moderate
1 study 0 of 1 positive 0 participants

Research Visualised

Visual breakdown of the clinical data.

Study Quality Breakdown

What types of studies were conducted

3/5
Randomised
2/5
Double-Blind
1/5
Placebo-Controlled

Participants Per Study

Larger samples = more reliable results

Study 1 (2006)
620
Study 2 (2013)
100
Study 3 (2007)
0
Study 1 (1997)
0
Study 1 (2022)
0

Research Timeline

When the studies were published

1
1997
1
2006
1
2007
1
2013
1
2022

All Studies

Detailed breakdown of each trial. Click to expand.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

1

To evaluate the beneficial effects of Urtica dioica root in the treatment of symptomatic BPH.

2006 620 participants 6 months 300 mg Urtica dioica root extract twice daily (600 mg/day)
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Placebo Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover

Purpose

To evaluate the beneficial effects of Urtica dioica root in the treatment of symptomatic BPH.

Dose

300 mg Urtica dioica root extract twice daily (600 mg/day)

Participants

620 men with symptomatic BPH

Duration

6 months

Results

Urtica dioica root significantly reduced IPSS and improved maximum urinary flow vs placebo. Residual urine volume decreased. QoL improved significantly. 81% of patients reported symptomatic improvement.

How They Measured It

IPSS, maximum urinary flow rate, residual urine volume, quality of life

Read full study
2

To assess the efficacy of Urtica dioica in 100 patients with BPH.

2013 100 participants 8 weeks Standardised Urtica dioica root extract
Human Study RCT Double-Blind Positive

Study Type

Randomised, double-blind

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of Urtica dioica in 100 patients with BPH.

Dose

Standardised Urtica dioica root extract

Participants

100 men with BPH

Duration

8 weeks

Results

Stinging nettle significantly improved IPSS total score and subscores. Maximum urinary flow (Q-max) increased significantly. PSA remained stable. Well tolerated.

How They Measured It

IPSS, Q-max, PSA, post-void residual volume

Read full study
3

To evaluate the comprehensive evidence for urticae radix (nettle root) in BPH management.

2007 ? participants Various Various
Human Study Positive

Study Type

Systematic review

Purpose

To evaluate the comprehensive evidence for urticae radix (nettle root) in BPH management.

Dose

Various

Participants

Systematic review

Duration

Various

Results

Nettle root is recommended for BPH-associated complaints. Clinical evidence supports significant IPSS improvement and urinary flow enhancement. Mechanisms include anti-proliferative effects on prostate stromal cells and SHBG inhibition.

How They Measured It

Review of clinical outcomes from relevant RCTs

Read full study

Anti-inflammatory Activity

1

To investigate the inhibiting effects of Urtica dioica root extracts on experimentally induced prostatic hyperplasia in mice.

1997 ? participants 4 weeks U. dioica root extract (various concentrations)
Animal Study Positive

Study Type

Animal study

Purpose

To investigate the inhibiting effects of Urtica dioica root extracts on experimentally induced prostatic hyperplasia in mice.

Dose

U. dioica root extract (various concentrations)

Participants

Mouse model

Duration

4 weeks

Results

U. dioica root extract significantly inhibited experimentally induced prostatic hyperplasia. Active compounds modulated inflammation via PGE2 inhibition and aromatase inhibition.

How They Measured It

Prostate weight, histological assessment, PSA levels

Read full study

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

1

To evaluate the effect of nettle root extract on urinary problems in older men with BPH.

2022 ? participants 12 months Standardised nettle root extract
Human Study RCT Mixed

Study Type

Randomised clinical trial

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of nettle root extract on urinary problems in older men with BPH.

Dose

Standardised nettle root extract

Participants

Older men with BPH and LUTS

Duration

12 months

Results

Urtica dioica improved IPSS at follow-ups up to 12 months vs controls. Results were consistent with meta-analytical evidence for clinically meaningful LUTS improvement.

How They Measured It

IPSS, urinary flow, quality of life measures

Read full study

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Stinging Nettle Root research

What does the research say about Stinging Nettle Root?

There are currently 9 peer-reviewed studies on Stinging Nettle Root (Urtica dioica L. (Root / Radix Extract)), involving 860 total participants. Research covers Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Lower urinary tract symptoms, Anti-inflammatory activity and 1 more areas. The overall evidence strength is rated as Strong.

How strong is the evidence for Stinging Nettle Root?

The evidence is currently rated as "Strong Evidence". This rating is based on study design quality (randomisation, blinding, placebo controls), sample sizes, study types (4 human studies, 1 animal study), and reported outcomes.

What health goals has Stinging Nettle Root been studied for?

Stinging Nettle Root has been researched for: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Lower urinary tract symptoms, Anti-inflammatory activity, Blood sugar support. Each area has its own body of evidence which you can explore in the study breakdowns above.

Are the studies on Stinging Nettle Root based on human trials?

Yes, 4 out of 9 studies are human trials. The remaining 1 is an animal study. Human trials carry more weight in our evidence scoring system.